Ok, so its mainly the targets

OK, so in general an ETS isn't a bad idea, but the CPRS isn't a good example of one:

• The targets are far too low, being set according to politics, not the 25-50% climate science demands
  
• It's confused ... its purpose is to fundamentally change the structure of our economy, but in every area where change is most likely and necessary, the CPRS tries to minimise the change??
• It ignores all the advice sought and received from the CSIRO, Treasury, the Garnaut Review, as well as the free advice from the UK's Stern Review